Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Digital Media Use in English Language
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to understand how learners view the role of digital platforms such as YouTube, online dictionaries, and learning applications, in enhancing their English skills. The qualitative method used in this study. Data were collected through semi- structured interviews with SMK Al-Maliki students who actively use digital media for learning English. Participants were selected through purposive sampling. The findings reveal that digital media increases students’ motivation and engagement; it provides access to authentic English exposure; it promotes both collaborative and independent learning; and there were some challenges arise due to unstable internet and distractions. The study concludes that digital media positively influences students’ engagement and English learning experiences when used effectively. However, successful implementation requires balanced teacher guidance, adequate infrastructure, and learner self-discipline. The study suggests that integrating digital tools strategically can create more interactive, autonomous, and meaningful EFL learning experiences.
Article Details
Issue
Section
How to Cite
References
Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232–238.
Almurashi, W. A. (2016). The effective use of YouTube videos for teaching English. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 4(3), 32–47.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007). Critical media literacy, democracy, and the reconstruction of education. In D. Macedo & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Media literacy: A reader (pp. 3–23). Peter Lang.
Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2009). New media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Majid, A., Rahman, S., & Anwar, M. (2025). EFL students’ perception on digital learning media technology: The case of secondary school in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Methodology, 5(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.12345/eltm.v5i1.1862
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Rahman, A., & Karim, A. (2022). Social media use in English language learning: A study of Indonesian EFL learners. Asian EFL Journal, 24(3), 115–134.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Tian, L., & Li, J. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning and students’ perceptions: Evidence from China. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 13(2), 1– 14.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.