This journal employs a rigorous double-blind peer review system, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process. Each submitted manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening to assess its suitability with the journal’s focus and scope.

Manuscripts that pass this stage are sent to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, and contribution to the field.

In cases of conflicting reviewer recommendations, an additional reviewer may be assigned. The final decision is made by the editorial board based on the reviewers’ reports and editorial judgment.