Using Guiding Questions Technique to Improve the Students' Writing Recount Text Achievement
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research is conducted to find the answer of the problem how the use of guiding questions technique can improve students’ writing recount text achievement in the first grade of science of Al Misri Islamic Senior High School Curahmalang, Rambipuji. The research design is classroom action research. This research is covered four stages of activities; they are planning of the action, implementing of the action, observing, and reflecting of the action. Based on the result of writing test in cycle one showed that the percentage of the students who got score 7,65 was 60%. And in cycle two, it improved to be 37%. In addition, the average result of the students’ active participation was 65% in cycle one. In cycle two, the average result of the students’ active participation indicated improvement that was 75%. It can be concluded that the action in cycle two was successful. Finally, it can be the use of guiding questions technique could improve the first grade of science students’ writing recount text achievement and could improve the first grade of science students’ active participation in teaching learning process at Al Misri Islamic Senior High School Curahmalang, Rambipuji.
Article Details
Issue
Section
How to Cite
References
Arikunto, S. 2006.Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.Jakarta: Rineka.
Ali, H.M. 1993. Strategi Penelitian Pendidikan. IKIP Bandung. Angkasa Bandung.
Bos, C.S. and Vaugho, S. 1991. Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning and Behavior Problems. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
Brannan, B. 2003. A Writer’s Workshop. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Buscemi, S.V. 2002. A Reader for Developing Writers. New York : Mc. Giow Hill Companies.
Carino, P. 1991. Basic Writing A First Course. New York.
Celce, M. 1981. Teaching English As a Second or Foreign Language : Third Edition. Editor.
Cooper, J.M. 1999. Classroom Teaching Skills. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Company.
Davis, Z.T. and Me Pearson, M.I. 1993. Story Map Instruction : A Road Map For Reading Cimprehension (Dec, 1993), PP. 232-240 [Serial Online]. http://www.storymap.com/articles/davis/pearsone1710890014023.Wagaman.2008.
Davis. 1993. The Example of Story Map [Serial Online]. http://www.theexampleofstorymap.com/articles/davis/pearson(copyright@houghtonmiffancompany.allrightsreserved).
Fairbairn, G.J. and Winch, C. 1996. Reading, Writing, and Reasoning. Buckingham : University Press.
Fraenkel, J.R., and Wallen, N.E. 1996. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York : McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Gerson, S.J, and Gerson. 1997. Technical Writing. London : Prentice Hall.
Goatly, A. 2000. Critical Reading and Writing : An Introductory Coursebook. London and New York.
Harmer, J. 1998. How to Teach English. England : Longman.
Heaton, J.B. 1991. Writing English Language Test. London : Longman Group Limited.
Hughes, A. 1996. Testing For Language Teachers. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Hughey, J.B. 1983. Teaching ESL Composition : Principles and Techniques. Rowley : Newbury House Publihers, Inc.
Langan, J. 1997. College Writing Skills, Media Edition. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Li, D. 2000. Effect of Story Mapping and Story Map Questions on The Story Writing Performance of Students With Learning Disabilities. http://etd.gb.ttu.edu/thesis/available/etd0731200831295Q16612151/unrestricted/31295016612151.pdf. [October 20th, 2010].
Mc. Millan, L.H. 1992. Educational Research : Fundamentals for Consumers. New York : Harper Collins Publihers.
Mendiola, R. 2005. Reading Strategy : Story Map. www.raiaelmendiola.com/FINAL%20story%20mapping%20rafael%20mendiola.doc. [October 20th, 2010].
Ploeger. 2000. Simplified Paragraph Skills. USA Gift of Sabre Foundation : IIEF.
Purwanto, M.N. 2000. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Wingersky, J. 1999. Writing Paragrahs and Essays Integrating Reading, Writing, and Grammar Skills. Boston : Wadsworth Publishing Company.